|
|
Friday, March 05, 2004 |
|
Hostile takeovers
Not since the 1980s, the heyday of hostile takeovers, have the markets seen this amount of high-profile attempts, according to an article in The Economist ("When battles commence", 2/19/2004). The article analyzes the abovementioned deals, all still pending, along with a number of failed bids in the US, Japan, and Europe. There are three defenses commonly used by the target company. One is using antitrust law, something PeopleSoft has used against Oracle so far, getting a Department of Justice ruling in its favor. The second is a "poison pill," a device "that allows shareholders in forms threatened by a hostile bid to buy new shares in their company at a big discount, that make it more costly to take over the firm." PeopleSoft has a poison pill provision. Studies indicate that 40% of the US's publicly-held firms have some kind of poison pill. The third method is the staggered board, meaning that the terms of board are staggered so that a sudden coup on the board is unlikely. 60% of major US firms have staggered boards. (PeopleSoft also has a staggered board - no wonder Oracle's task is so difficult.) 6:08:29 PM |