|
|
Sunday, May 16, 2004 |
|
Food industry trends We always take such prognoses with a grain of salt: Trend reports are generally naive concoctions that assume a linear progress based on the recent past and take no account of disruptions. They are also written to give pseudo-objective support for marketing executives to use or misuse at will to support new initiatives: "This report predicts that consumer demand for widgets will grow by 2 million a year…" These made-up "facts" look nice in a Power Point presentation. In one industry I know, the president of the leading market prediction company privately has admitted that because no one wants to pay money to hear bad news, all of the reports are under pressure to be upbeat and as optimistic as possible. After all, nobody remembers the last predictions when the next marketing team comes in or the next campaign is readied. In any case, we can look at some of the CAP Gemini ideas and see if they still make sense two years later. It's based on interviews with over 200 food industry executives. Here are the conclusions:
None of these conclusions are surprising, but they do seem still valid and they do summarize a lot of what I've written about the industry on this site, though there's lots more at play that remains unmentioned by the report (take, for example, the compelx issue of brand extension or the more global issues of disruption and innovation.) The trend toward oligopoly is unmistakable and the battle between the manufacturers and retailers is getting more and more furious all the time. While some players rise and fall (Parmalat and Ahold, for example), the patterns are clear. 1:38:07 PM |